County intervention in BPU proceeding against JCP&L
Summary
The county formally told state regulators that JCP&L's reliability programs have failed — outages got worse even as the utility claimed improvement, and during the July heat wave JCP&L reported 5,000 outages when 40,000 actually occurred. The county wants penalties assessed and opposes JCP&L's 8.5% rate hike request.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 19, 2026.
Impact analysis
Residents face frequent multi-day outages, and JCP&L is simultaneously seeking an 8.5% base rate increase.
County residents and businesses who suffer extended power outages.
JCP&L, which could face monetary penalties and denial of its rate increase.
Mentions & discussions (2)
Board of County Commissioners (Regular) - Aug 19, 2026
The county formally told state regulators that JCP&L's reliability programs have failed — outages got worse even as the utility claimed improvement, and during the July heat wave JCP&L reported 5,000 outages when 40,000 actually occurred. The county wants penalties assessed and opposes JCP&L's 8.5% rate hike request.
Board of County Commissioners (Regular) - Jul 22, 2026
The state Board of Public Utilities has moved against JCP&L for failing reliability standards in 2022-2024, and the county voted to intervene. Residents who've endured repeated storm outages can also file their own comments or motions — docket EO25070453, with a separate storm-response review under EO26070387.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Sussex County
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.